Repurposed Drugs & Integrative Cancer Care (2026)
An evidence‑aware guide to off‑label cancer therapies, integrative oncology, and emerging research — without hype or false promises.
This page serves as the central hub for OneDayMD’s coverage of repurposed drugs in cancer care, integrating conventional oncology standards with systems biology, real‑world data, and ethical analysis.
What This Hub Covers (Quick Overview)
This hub explains:
What repurposed drugs are — and what they are not.
Which drugs show credible anti‑cancer signals vs speculation.
How repurposed therapies may (or may not) integrate with standard oncology.
The evidence hierarchy used across OneDayMD.
Safety, ethics, and regulatory realities.
It is designed for patients, clinicians, and researchers seeking clarity rather than promotion.
![]() |
| Diverse cancer hallmarks targeted by repurposed non-oncology drugs. This figure was created with Biorender.com. Source: Nature 2024 |
Executive Summary
Repurposed drugs in cancer care refer to existing, FDA‑approved medications originally developed for non‑cancer indications that show potential anti‑cancer effects through epidemiological signals, mechanistic pathways, real‑world data, or early clinical trials. Interest has surged due to rising cancer incidence, plateauing outcomes in late‑stage disease, escalating oncology drug costs, and advances in systems biology and AI‑driven drug discovery.
This pillar provides a structured, evidence‑graded framework to evaluate repurposed cancer drugs without hype or dismissal. It distinguishes signal from speculation, integrates conventional oncology standards, and clarifies where integrative approaches may complement — but not replace — standard of care.
Why Repurposed Drugs Matter in Oncology
1. The Economic and Clinical Reality
Novel oncology drugs often exceed $100,000–$300,000 per year
Median survival benefits in advanced cancers are frequently measured in months
Many repurposed drugs are off‑patent, inexpensive, and globally available
2. Biology Has Outpaced Drug Development
Cancer is now understood as a systems disease involving:
Metabolic dysregulation
Immune evasion
Inflammation
Microbiome interactions
Mitochondrial dysfunction
Most classic chemotherapy agents target cell division alone, leaving other cancer hallmarks unaddressed.
3. Real‑World Evidence Is Generating Hypotheses
Observational data repeatedly show unexpected cancer outcomes in patients taking certain non‑oncology drugs — prompting deeper investigation.
Evidence Hierarchy Used in This Guide
Each repurposed drug discussed on OneDayMD is categorized using the following framework:
🟢 High Evidence: Multiple RCTs or meta‑analyses with clinical endpoints
🟡 Moderate Evidence: Observational studies, strong mechanistic support, early trials
🔴 Preliminary Evidence: Case reports, in‑vitro/in‑vivo studies only
⚠️ Anecdotal: Testimonials without reproducible data
This hierarchy is essential to prevent overinterpretation and to guide ethical decision‑making.
Core Classes of Repurposed Cancer Drugs
1. Antiparasitic & Anthelmintic Agents
Fenbendazole
Original use: Veterinary anthelmintic
Proposed mechanisms:
Microtubule destabilization
Impaired glucose uptake
Mitochondrial stress induction
Evidence level: 🔴 Preliminary
In‑vitro and animal data
Case reports and anecdotal human use
No completed randomized human cancer trials
Key risks:
Lack of human dosing data
Hepatotoxicity reports
Unknown long‑term safety
Fenbendazole remains hypothesis‑generating only and should not be conflated with clinically validated therapies.
Mebendazole
Original use: Human antiparasitic
Proposed mechanisms:
Tubulin inhibition
Anti‑angiogenesis
Hedgehog pathway interference
Evidence level: 🟡 Moderate
Multiple preclinical cancer models
Small clinical trials in glioblastoma and brain tumors
Favorable human safety profile
Mebendazole is among the most biologically plausible repurposed candidates, though still not standard of care.
Ivermectin
Original use: Antiparasitic
Proposed mechanisms:
Inhibition of WNT/β‑catenin signaling
Mitochondrial dysfunction
Immunomodulation
Evidence level: 🟡 Moderate
Extensive preclinical oncology literature
Epidemiologic signals
No definitive oncology RCTs
Caution is warranted due to dose‑dependent toxicity and extrapolation beyond approved indications.
2. Metabolic & Endocrine Modulators
Metformin
Original use: Type 2 diabetes
Mechanisms:
AMPK activation
mTOR suppression
Insulin/IGF‑1 reduction
Evidence level: 🟡→🟢 Moderate to High
Strong epidemiological cancer risk reduction
Multiple cancer‑specific trials ongoing
Favorable safety profile
Metformin represents one of the strongest repurposing success stories in oncology research.
Statins
Original use: Hyperlipidemia
Mechanisms:
Mevalonate pathway inhibition
Reduced prenylation of oncogenic proteins
Evidence level: 🟡 Moderate
Mixed RCT results
Strong observational mortality reduction signals
Benefit appears context‑dependent by cancer type and statin class.
3. Anti‑Inflammatory & Immune‑Modulating Agents
Aspirin
Mechanisms:
COX‑2 inhibition
Platelet‑mediated metastasis reduction
Evidence level: 🟢 High (specific cancers)
Colorectal cancer prevention and recurrence reduction
Bleeding risk limits universal use
4. Anti‑Angiogenic & Anti‑Fibrotic Drugs
Propranolol
Original use: Beta‑blocker
Mechanisms:
Stress hormone suppression
Angiogenesis inhibition
Evidence level: 🟡 Moderate
Strong data in angiosarcoma
Ongoing trials in breast and melanoma
Repurposed Drugs vs Standard Oncology Care
Critical principle:
Repurposed drugs are adjunctive candidates, not replacements for surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy.
Situations where repurposed drugs are studied:
Maintenance therapy
Treatment‑resistant disease
Synergy with immunotherapy
Risk reduction and recurrence prevention
Integrative Oncology: Where It Fits
Integrative cancer care combines:
Evidence‑based lifestyle interventions
Nutritional optimization
Exercise oncology
Selected supplements with mechanistic rationale
Psychosocial and stress modulation
Not integrative oncology:
Abandoning proven treatments
Relying solely on anecdotes
Ignoring toxicity and interactions
Safety, Ethics, and Regulatory Reality
Off‑Label Use
Legal but physician‑directed
Requires informed consent
Lacks pharmaceutical company liability
Key Risks
Drug–drug interactions
False hope and treatment delay
Online misinformation ecosystems
Ethical Standard
Any exploration of repurposed drugs must satisfy:
Transparent uncertainty disclosure
Continuous reassessment
Alignment with patient values
The Role of AI and In‑Silico Trials
AI is accelerating repurposing by:
Pattern recognition in large datasets
Drug–pathway matching
Virtual clinical trial simulation
However:
AI does not replace human trials
Bias and data quality remain limiting factors
Who Should Consider Learning About Repurposed Drugs?
Patients seeking informed discussions with oncologists
Clinicians exploring adjunctive research
Researchers developing low‑cost oncology strategies
Who should not self‑prescribe:
Newly diagnosed patients without oncology consultation
Individuals delaying curative treatment
Bottom Line
Repurposed drugs represent a legitimate research frontier, not a miracle cure. Some candidates (metformin, aspirin) are nearing mainstream integration; others remain speculative. Responsible engagement requires evidence literacy, humility, and strict adherence to ethical medical practice.
This pillar serves as the foundation for all repurposed oncology content on OneDayMD.
Start Here: Core Guides & Deep Dives
Foundational Guides
Repurposed & Off-Label Drugs in Cancer: Understanding the Evidence Hierarchy
Integrative Oncology Explained – What evidence‑based integration actually means
Drug‑Specific Deep Dives
- Mebendazole vs fenbendazole for cancer
- Ivermectin vs Fenbendazole for Cancer
- Best Ivermectin Dosage for Humans with Cancer or Different Cancer Types
- Best Fenbendazole Dosage for Humans: Safety, Side Effects and Efficacy Examined
- Fenbendazole, Ivermectin and Mebendazole Cancer Success Stories: 465 Case Reports Compilation (January 2026 Edition)
Who This Hub Is For
This page is useful if you are:
A patient seeking informed conversations with your oncology team
A clinician exploring adjunctive research responsibly
A researcher or analyst studying low‑cost oncology strategies
This page is not a substitute for:
Oncology consultation
Individualized treatment decisions
Emergency or curative care

Comments
Post a Comment