Ivermectin Cancer Success Stories: Case Series (2024)
Ivermectin and cancer related articles and information are all over the internet. We have done our research online and found that most of the studies are pre-clinical studies and there is a lack of clinical studies published on the internet. We have compiled, found these case reports (by cancer type) and gather them in one place to help in your further research.
While there's growing interest in Ivermectin's potential use against cancer, it's crucial to rely on trustworthy sources. We've gathered case reports (categorized by cancer type) for your reference. This is intended to be a starting point for your research, and it's important to consult with a medical professional for any questions or treatment options.
Below is the list categorised by different cancer types alphabetically.
Basal Cell Carcinoma and Melanoma: Ivermectin and Fenbendazole
Progress:
Days 1-10: No notable changes.
Day 11: Inflammation and severe itching observed on the back of the hand and a 1x3 inch area above the basal cell. Oozing of clear amber liquid noted.
Day 15: The pink spot on the ring finger darkened, transformed into a bump, and the whole area became swollen and red.
Day 30+: The skin on the red oozing areas began sloughing off and was replaced by tender pink "baby skin." The chest basal cell shrank only slightly, and the hands and chest began healing.
Additional Treatments: The patient applied c-herb to the ring finger, resulting in a tiny hole where the dark spot/bump used to be. The chest basal cell was also treated next with c-herb. Timing of these additions is unclear.
Outcome: Both the chest lesion and the ring finger lesion disappeared, leaving craters in their places - the tumor on the chest wholly detached and fell off. The patient treated the craters with sangre de grado, and both areas have healed well: the skin on the back of the hand and chest area is now fully healed, with a healthy, normal appearance.
Source: https://veryvirology.substack.com/p/curing-cancer-success (May 2023)
Breast Cancer: Ivermectin and Balstilimab for the Treatment of Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer
This phase 2 trial studies the side effects and best dose of ivermectin in combination with balstilimab and to see how well they they work in shrinking tumors in patients with triple negative breast cancer that has spread to other places in the body (metastatic). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as balstilimab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Ivermectin may help block the formation of growths that may become cancer. Giving ivermectin with balstilimab may increase the effect of balstilimab in shrinking tumors in patients with triple negative breast cancer. Source: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05318469
Colorectal Cancer and Ivermectin
Dr Justus Hope reported on a case of Stage IV Colon Cancer that appeared hopeless. The gentleman, Rick, had widespread metastatic disease affecting the liver and lymph nodes and was told his cancer was “unsurvivable.” At most, he had six months left, according to his oncologist.
Following adding Ivermectin, his tumor markers dropped from 1489 to 4.7, and his metastases calcified and shrunk. This was believed due to the anti-metastatic effect of Ivermectin as it suppresses the WnT Pathway, which cancer stem cells rely upon.
Following adding Ivermectin, his tumor markers dropped from 1489 to 4.7, and his metastases calcified and shrunk. This was believed due to the anti-metastatic effect of Ivermectin as it suppresses the WnT Pathway, which cancer stem cells rely upon.
Read More: Ivermectin for Large Intestine Cancer
Esophageal Cancer and Ivermectin
Dr. Kathleen Ruddy reported on a case of unresectable esophageal cancer:
A second patient crossed my path, a guy in his seventies who lost 40 pounds over a year-and-a-half, was not vaccinated, was a smoker and drinker, and all he did was fish. He could no longer swallow and he could hardly talk. I got on the phone with him and said, “Eddie, tell me a little bit about your history.” He knew someone with prostate cancer who had taken ivermectin and cured himself from prostate cancer with it.
Eddie began taking ivermectin. I have no idea what the dosing was. He was just taking it. I gave him some advice about diet and how to get the weight back on. In a couple of weeks, he sounded stronger. He could swallow, his voice was better, and he had gained six pounds. I followed him for another month or so.
I said, “Eddie, we need to get a scan.” He doesn’t have insurance. He doesn’t like doctors. He had been diagnosed in that interval with two unresectable esophageal tumors. The surgeons wouldn’t go near it. The doctor said, “We'll give you chemo and radiation.” He said, “No, you’re not.” He just takes his ivermectin.
About six weeks later, I said, “Eddie, you need to get a scan.” I had to argue with Eddie to get a scan. We got the scan. No tumors. Gone. The biggest problem was that he had sold his fishing boat. He was getting better and his tumor was gone. Now, he needed to go out and buy another fishing boat. That was the second patient. Again, I said, “Now, that’s interesting.”
Gall Bladder Cancer and Ivermectin
Dr. Allan Landrito reported on a colleague of his with terminal gall bladder cancer who added a high dose of daily Ivermectin for some 14 months. At the conclusion, scans reported a complete resolution of her cancer.
Dr. Landrito discussed how this happened. A doctor called him on the radio and asked what the correct dose for Ivermectin would be if someone had cancer. He provided the dose, and she took it for her fist-sized gallbladder cancer.
“[53:43] We have achieved one cure already. It’s a case of gallbladder cancer, and as it so happens, she is a doctor herself.”
“[54:10] I had a chance to meet her on the radio interview. And I told her, “Lenora, Ivermectin has anti-cancer properties. And she asked me how much should I take.” Because she had cancer, but I didn’t know what kind of cancer she had or how terrible her cancer was.
And I said, “The highest you can take, that’s it. There’s no recommendation. Because being a doctor herself, she treated herself. And later on, we learned about what she did.”
Landrito noted she took an extremely high dose for the first few months of 2 mg/kg per day. Although she experienced visual side effects for a few days, they quickly resolved as she grew accustomed to the medication [55:13].
The doctor carefully monitored her liver and kidney function tests to ensure no toxicity. Monthly ultrasound scans revealed consistent shrinkage of the tumor. After 14 months, the ultrasound showed a completely normal scan with “no trace of cancer [56:14].” Creatinine and SGPT testing remained normal throughout the high-dose Ivermectin course of therapy.
As a result of this case, Dr. Landrito has embarked on a study and treatment approach using Ivermectin with encouraging results.
As a result of this case, Dr. Landrito has embarked on a study and treatment approach using Ivermectin with encouraging results.
He explained that Ivermectin induces autophagy and apoptosis, death and destruction of cancer cells. He also noted that research shows that Ivermectin alters intracellular chloride concentrations in leukemia cells while preserving mitochondrial membrane potentials [49:41].
Landrito notes this is crucially important as recent evidence shows that cancer is a metabolic disease mediated through mitochondria, not through genetic mutations, as previously thought [49:45].
Thus, Ivermectin can selectively damage cancer cells by preserving mitochondrial health but damaging cancer cell membrane potentials. Landrito explained that poor nutrition likely triggers cancer’s development as it gradually adopts a fermentation pathway. He notes that overnight fasting – 16 hours – can induce autophagy and cancer cell death. However, with the addition of Ivermectin, one does not need to wait 16 hours as the autophagy will begin sooner [52:00]. He is seeing positive results in many of his indigent cancer patient populations.
He has seen other patients with metastatic cancer transform from pain-ridden invalids to carefree and active family members.
Neck Cancer and Ivermectin
Case Report: Oscar Nacu, a man with a grotesque neck tumor involving canon-ball lung metastases [01:32:00].
After three months of high dose Ivermectin exceeding 2.4 mg/kg per day, the lung metastases shrank, and he no longer required pain medication [01:37:13]. In addition, he walked up to one mile daily and spontaneously sang and danced.
Dr. Shankara Chetty explained, “[01:37:13] Ever since we’ve given him the Lactoferrin and Ivermectin, he no longer takes painkillers. If you will notice, he actually looks younger now than when we started. We still don’t have a cure, but we have a fellow that has been taking Ivermectin since August 29, and he is now at 2.45 mg/kg per day and is still not showing signs of overdosing. And the last I heard was that yesterday he was singing, and he was dancing [01:37:45].”
Dr. Landrito has treated hundreds of thousands of patients with Ivermectin and now growing numbers of cancer patients, all without any substantial adverse effects. Physicians only need to ask why they would not offer this safe repurposed drug to a patient with metastatic disease who has no other options. Why not offer it to patients at high risk of metastatic disease before the cancer spreads?
Ovarian Cancer and Ivermectin
Dr. Tess Lawrie reported on a case of ovarian metastatic cancer with subsequent involvement of the peritoneum – a common spread area. Despite an initial tumor marker (Ca125) level of 288, following Ivermectin and three (9 weeks) chemotherapy sessions, her Ca125 level dropped to 22. There was a substantial regression with no trace of tumor on the peritoneum.Following removing the uterus and ovaries, the surgeon added, “This is extraordinary. No tumor. Some dead cells on the peritoneum that I removed. The biopsy confirmed that everything has gone – Ca125 at 3.”
Ovarian Cancer (Krukenberg tumor) and Ivermectin
Dr. Kathleen Ruddy reported on a case of Krukenberg tumor in her pelvis:The third patient was a woman who was referred to me. Her husband called me. He said, “Could you talk to my wife? I think she’s got a problem.” She could feel a lump in her lower pelvis. She had had that for a while. I asked her, “Do you have any vaginal bleeding?” She replied, “Yes, a little bit, but not much.”
I said that the best thing to do would be to go to the doctor and get a CAT scan. She doesn’t like doctors. She doesn’t have insurance. She’s not getting a CAT scan. I was able to convince her to at least get an ultrasound. She gets an ultrasound. She has a 6-centimeter tumor in her pelvis. It’s close to the colon, it’s close to the ovary, it might be near the uterus, who knows? It’s just wedged down there.
I said, “It would be very helpful if you would at least be willing to do a needle biopsy because if it’s cancer, it’s going to make a difference in terms of what your choices are.” Nope, she’s not going to do that. I called her periodically over the next couple of months. She says, “I’m fine, no problem.” I said, “Call me if you need me.”
This was in April or May. I got a call on December 23rd from her husband at 9.30 at night. Her belly is distended. She can’t eat, she’s not passing gas, she’s not passing stool, and her abdomen hurts. I said, “Press down on her belly, does that hurt?” When he presses down it hurts. I said, “Now, press and lift up really quickly and ask if that hurts.” He said, “Yes, that’s worse.”
I said, “Get her to the emergency room.” He said, “We don’t have insurance, we don’t like doctors, we’re in West Virginia, and we hate the hospitals. I said, “Look, she’s going to blow out her bowel and then you’re going to take her to the emergency room and she’s going to die. I suggest you go now.”
Okay, he takes her to the emergency room. They do a CAT scan and it’s an 18 centimeter tumor. Who knows what it’s wrapped around. They gave her intravenous and I said, “Let me talk to the ER doc.”
I said, “Is she stable enough? Can you rehydrate her? Is she stable enough to go to Charlottesville? Because I know people in Charlottesville, and UVA Health has a great hospital there. Let’s see if we can get her to Charlottesville.”
The ER doctor, I can imagine, was very happy to get her on the way to UVA. They admit her on Christmas Eve. They hydrate her and give her nutrition. The head of the surgical oncology team comes in to see her, a brilliant surgeon. He said, “I’m not sure that I can resect this. But let’s tune you up and let’s see what we can do. If I can, I will.”
She gets all tuned up and ready to go. The hospital would not give her unvaccinated blood, so there was a big Shakespearean melodrama the night before surgery. She said, “I’ve got to have the surgery,” but she did not require blood transfusion, thank God.
The surgical oncologist was brilliant. He goes in with a vascular team, a GYN team, and a urologic team, because it’s wrapped around the ureter and who knows what’s going on with the uterus. They all go in and seven-and-a-half hours later, they close.
They got the whole thing to negative margins. She had three mets in her liver. Then postoperatively during her recovery, the metastatic lesions in the liver multiplied, which is not uncommon. She went home maybe five or six days later, after an uneventful postoperative course. Again, the surgical team at UVA gets an A-plus.
She gets in the car and goes back to West Virginia. Of course, the medical oncology people at UVA insist that she have chemo. They are breathing down on her. They’re making appointments for her. They say, “This is not a question. We think you should have this. Here’s your appointment.”
She said, “I’m going back to West Virginia.” She started taking ivermectin, probably taking a little bit higher dose. I don’t think it was sky high. But anyway, ivermectin is safer than a sugar pill. You would have to take a lot to make yourself sick.
Mr. Jekielek: Let’s stop for a moment. It’s safer than a sugar pill?
Dr. Ruddy: Yes. This might be a bit of an exaggeration, but not by much. Ivermectin is so non-toxic that if you did a randomized trial, and these people are getting ivermectin every day and these people are getting sugar pills every day, my prediction—test it and see what happens—would be that the people who are getting the sugar pills would end up having more harm, like spikes in their insulin level, than the people taking ivermectin. That’s why I say, kind of flippantly, that it’s safer than a sugar pill.
Anyway, she starts taking ivermectin. I said, “We need to do a scan.” Everybody gets sick of hearing me say that we need to do a scan. She didn’t want that. How about an ultrasound? Because you can image the liver pretty well with an ultrasound. They had had an ultrasound, so we could compare.
The liver is clean and there is nothing in the liver. She’s fine. She’s driving around with her husband. She’s going down to the southern border and pushing back against the illegal aliens. She’s doing very, very well. That was the third patient.
Pancreatic Cancer and Ivermectin
The following paper is not a human study but is the first study to evaluate the anticancer effects of the combination of Ivermectin and gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer: Ivermectin and Gemcitabine for Pancreatic Cancer.
Prostate Cancer and Ivermectin
Dr. Kathleen Ruddy reported on a case of stage 4 prostate cancer:
He worked for the government, and he was going to lose his job and his pension if he wasn’t vaccinated. Two months after his second Pfizer shot, he was diagnosed all at once with stage 4 prostate cancer. He tells a very compelling, melodramatic story about that 24-hour period of time in his life.
He went through the traditional protocols; radiation, chemotherapy, pharmacologic, castration, all of it, over a period of nine months. His name is Paul Mann. His doctor said, “There’s really nothing else we can do. He said, “Can’t you give me more radiation? Can’t you give me more chemo? Aren’t there any other drugs? Are there any clinical trials? The answer was, “No, there’s nothing. There is only hospice. Send for the priest.”
A friend of his knew me and said, “Would you give Paul a call? He just needs some moral support.” I began calling him and we spoke about once a week for three weeks. The poor guy was suffering and had cancer in 11 bones in his body. His right leg was completely swollen and obstructed with a tumor. He was miserable.
I said, “Paul, I don’t know if this is going to help you, but I know it’s not going to hurt you. I just can’t imagine based on my judgment and understanding of the scientific literature and all of the work that Doctors Kory and Marik have done that ivermectin would hurt you. It might help, but I can’t say.”
He said, “I'll give it a try.” He drove to Tennessee where you could get it without a prescription. He drove from where he lives in New York to Tennessee and paid cash for his ivermectin. He didn’t submit it to an insurance company. He didn’t tell his oncologist back in Missouri.
His ivermectin prescriptions were listed in his medical chart. How did that information get from the pharmacy in Tennessee to his chart in Missouri? They don’t know. But actually, somebody does know, and I'd like to know myself.
Anyway, he starts taking ivermectin. He doesn’t have any problems with it. I talk to him every week, “How are you feeling? How’s your leg? How’s the pain? He says, “No change. But I don’t know. It’s not quite as swollen. There’s pain everywhere. Maybe it’s getting a little bit better. It’s not necessarily getting worse.”
Fast forward to a two-month follow-up appointment at the clinic. They didn’t expect to see him. He’s feeling a little bit better. They do a PSA [Prostrate-Specific Antigen Test], which in the beginning was off the charts, maybe 700 or 800. At the time, they recommended him to hospice.
Mr. Jekielek: What exactly do those numbers mean, for the layperson?
Dr. Ruddy: Over four would be abnormal. What are we talking about here? Prostate cells normally secrete a protein, a prostate-specific antigen. It’s one of the things that they do. Cancer cells that originate in the prostate that are dividing rapidly and growing fast are spitting out PSA. It’s not that they’re contributing to the body economy in any way. It’s just they just want to multiply and divide. That’s the end of the story.
Your PSA levels start to rise, which is a screening marker. They will say, “Your PSA was four, and now it’s eight. Let’s do a prostate ultrasound.” The PSA can be a screen for the emergence of a tumor, but it can also be used, particularly at high levels, as evidence for cancer, response to cancer, or recurrence of cancer. His was supposed to be four, but it’s in the hundreds.
He goes back for a two-month appointment and it’s 1.3. They said, “You’re in biochemical remission.” He was not in complete remission, because he still had the bone metastasis, but this was good news. Slowly, he begins to improve. There is less pain and the swelling is down. He has a lot of other vaccine injuries, but he’s getting better.
He worked for the government, and he was going to lose his job and his pension if he wasn’t vaccinated. Two months after his second Pfizer shot, he was diagnosed all at once with stage 4 prostate cancer. He tells a very compelling, melodramatic story about that 24-hour period of time in his life.
He went through the traditional protocols; radiation, chemotherapy, pharmacologic, castration, all of it, over a period of nine months. His name is Paul Mann. His doctor said, “There’s really nothing else we can do. He said, “Can’t you give me more radiation? Can’t you give me more chemo? Aren’t there any other drugs? Are there any clinical trials? The answer was, “No, there’s nothing. There is only hospice. Send for the priest.”
A friend of his knew me and said, “Would you give Paul a call? He just needs some moral support.” I began calling him and we spoke about once a week for three weeks. The poor guy was suffering and had cancer in 11 bones in his body. His right leg was completely swollen and obstructed with a tumor. He was miserable.
I said, “Paul, I don’t know if this is going to help you, but I know it’s not going to hurt you. I just can’t imagine based on my judgment and understanding of the scientific literature and all of the work that Doctors Kory and Marik have done that ivermectin would hurt you. It might help, but I can’t say.”
He said, “I'll give it a try.” He drove to Tennessee where you could get it without a prescription. He drove from where he lives in New York to Tennessee and paid cash for his ivermectin. He didn’t submit it to an insurance company. He didn’t tell his oncologist back in Missouri.
His ivermectin prescriptions were listed in his medical chart. How did that information get from the pharmacy in Tennessee to his chart in Missouri? They don’t know. But actually, somebody does know, and I'd like to know myself.
Anyway, he starts taking ivermectin. He doesn’t have any problems with it. I talk to him every week, “How are you feeling? How’s your leg? How’s the pain? He says, “No change. But I don’t know. It’s not quite as swollen. There’s pain everywhere. Maybe it’s getting a little bit better. It’s not necessarily getting worse.”
Fast forward to a two-month follow-up appointment at the clinic. They didn’t expect to see him. He’s feeling a little bit better. They do a PSA [Prostrate-Specific Antigen Test], which in the beginning was off the charts, maybe 700 or 800. At the time, they recommended him to hospice.
Mr. Jekielek: What exactly do those numbers mean, for the layperson?
Dr. Ruddy: Over four would be abnormal. What are we talking about here? Prostate cells normally secrete a protein, a prostate-specific antigen. It’s one of the things that they do. Cancer cells that originate in the prostate that are dividing rapidly and growing fast are spitting out PSA. It’s not that they’re contributing to the body economy in any way. It’s just they just want to multiply and divide. That’s the end of the story.
Your PSA levels start to rise, which is a screening marker. They will say, “Your PSA was four, and now it’s eight. Let’s do a prostate ultrasound.” The PSA can be a screen for the emergence of a tumor, but it can also be used, particularly at high levels, as evidence for cancer, response to cancer, or recurrence of cancer. His was supposed to be four, but it’s in the hundreds.
He goes back for a two-month appointment and it’s 1.3. They said, “You’re in biochemical remission.” He was not in complete remission, because he still had the bone metastasis, but this was good news. Slowly, he begins to improve. There is less pain and the swelling is down. He has a lot of other vaccine injuries, but he’s getting better.
Stomach Cancer and Ivermectin
Source: X.com
IVERMECTIN Solution much more bioavailable than IVERMECTIN pills: Study
In 2023, a research team in Argentina led by Ceballos et al. analyzed systemic availability and disposition kinetics of Ivermectin orally administered as different pharmaceutical formulations (tablet, solution, or capsule) to healthy adults. Volunteers were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 experimental groups and orally treated with IVM as either, a tablet, solution, or capsules at 0.4 mg/kg Blood samples were taken as dried blood spots (DBS) between 2 and 48 h post-treatment and IVM was analyzed by HPLC with fluorescence detection
Conclusion:
- Liquid Ivermectin gives 68% higher peak blood level than tablet (120.4 vs 71.8)
- Liquid Ivermectin gives 56% higher systemic availability than tablet (1653 vs 1056)
- Women reach 76% higher peak blood level with Liquid Ivermectin than men (153.7 vs 87.1)
- Women get 27% more systemic availability from Liquid Ivermectin than men
Key Takeaway
Remember that these references are based on case reports, which provide preliminary evidence. For more comprehensive information, consider exploring additional research studies and clinical trials. Always consult with your healthcare provider before making any treatment decisions.
Find Integrative Oncologists in USA, Mexico, Europe or Asia
While the potential anti-cancer properties of ivermectin are intriguing, it’s crucial to approach with caution.Consulting with an integrative healthcare expert is key to crafting a ivermectin protocol tailored to your unique health requirements.
To find integrative oncologists, check out "find integrative oncologists".
New & Improved Joe Tippens Protocol
- Fenbendazole* (300 mg, 6 days a week) or in the case of severe turbo cancers up to 1 gram.
- Ivermectin* (24 mg, 7 days a week) or in the case of severe turbo cancers up to 1mg/kg/day.
- Bio-Available Curcumin* (600mg per day, 2 pills per day 7 days a week).
- Vitamin D* (62.5 mcg [2500 IU] seven days a week).
- Tocotrienol and Tocopherol forms (all 8) of Vitamin E (400-800mg per day, 7 days a week). A product called Gamma E by Life Extension*.
- Removing sugar from one’s diet is crucial during this protocol. (BMJ 2023)
- Eating a nutritious fresh whole-food diet with fruits and vegetables, avoid ultra processed foods (BMJ 2024) and a healthy lifestyle with less stress.
- CBD oil (1-2 droppers full [equal to 167 to 334 mg per day] under the tongue, 7 days a week) CBD-X: The most potent full spectrum organic CBD oil, with 5,000 milligrams of activated cannabinoids and hemp compounds CBD, CBN & CBG per serving.
*Disclosure: Ad and 'paid link'.
Notes and Disclaimers:
- Please do not consider this guide as personal medical advice, but as a recommendation for use by professional providers. Consult with your doctor and discuss with her/him.
- Our aim here isn't to replace your doctors' advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information. Do take note that most treatments are not 100% protective or curative against cancer. It's a continuous struggle between the immune system and the cancer cells. Cancer treatments are meant to assist the immune system in this battle.
- Cancer treatment should be part of a multi-modal approach in order to provide the best possible outcome. Diet and lifestyle changes are meant to run alongside conventional treatment. They are complementary, not alternative. That said, there is no miracle diet or treatment that can cure all cancers.
Read More: This article is part of the Winning the War on Cancer series.
Comments
Post a Comment